Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

John Ingrassia recently won a suppression motion after an evidentiary hearing in a local criminal court involving a DWI case.

Mr. Ingrassia was able to persuade the Court that the police lacked probable cause to believe that his client was under the influence of alcohol. Mr. Ingrassia's cross examination of the arresting police officer established that Field Sobriety Tests were incorrectly administered and as a result the court suppressed the breath test result obtained in the case.